Two days ago, I ended a long hiatus
from listening to NPR while I am working at home. I had unplugged due
to increasing frustration with the inability of the press, public or
otherwise, to report actual news, rather than the topic du jour, or
science that is not really new, but becoming more and more important
and relevant while not spurring action. I do support public radio,
and will continue to do so because at least there, there is a desire
to report fully and objectively whatever is going on locally,
nationally, regionally, and globally.
Having said all that, I turned to my
local NPR station only to find that endless time slots appear to be
devoted to the lapse of security that is the Secret Service. I think
we can all agree (most of us surely), that our President, his family,
and those who work with and for him/them, need to be protected from
those that would seek to do them harm. However, does that mean that
most, if not all, business has to grind to a halt to analyze the
issue/lapse down to its minutiae? I think not. Is bold action called
for? Yes, the head of that service resigned amid calls for her to do
so. A shake-up, or at least a review of procedures and policies for
securing the First Family, and their entourage is reasonable. Now
that that has been undertaken, may we get back to the real business
of the American people? I saw/heard at least as many reports about
the Secret Service debacle, as compared to the Ebola epidemic that is
building on itself. Surely, there are many other issues needing to be
considered and/or acted upon now that a security lapse has been
discovered, and a serious one at that, and the remedy begun.
No comments:
Post a Comment